Neon Red Periodic Table Wallpaper

Princess Diana Conspiracy Theories - 1582 Words

Diana, Princess of Wales was considered the people’s princess. She married Prince Charles, son of Queen Elizabeth II, of England in 1981. When they divorced in late 1996 the people were heart broken over the affair that Prince Charles had with Camilla Parker Bowles. Princess Diana led the same life she had been, she continued her charity work and her love life. The tragedy that left the country in tears and the world in disbelief, ended with unanswered questions which people turned into conspiracy theories. Princess Diana was killed in an attempt to keep the country s secrets safe. Princess Diana, Dodi al Fayed, Trevor Rees-Jones, and Henri Paul left the Ritz Hotel to escape the paparazzi on Sunday, August 31, 1997 at 12:20 am. Sutton and†¦show more content†¦Co-author of The Bodyguard’s Story Moira Johnston (2000) noted that â€Å"the Mercedes, as it approached the tunnel, was travelling at a speed between 118 and 155 kilometers per hour-between 73 and 96 miles per hour-in a speed zone limited to 30 miles per hour†(p.95). As Henri attempted to take Avenue George V exit that led straight to Fayed’s apartment, he found it was blocked by paparazzi motorcycles, also at the speed he was going, the smallest curve would have been hard to control. Lastly, there was a small collision with a white Fiat Uno. These factors made it hard for anyone to prevent the accident. After Henri tried to exit the first tunnel he swerved back into the tunnel and hit the white Fiat Uno. After the collision, Jones (2000) observed that, in an attempt to slow the Mercedes, he accidentally shifted the Mercedes into neutral, he hit the brakes 64 meters before impact. Jones (2000) also reported that â€Å"the Mercedes [became] a hurtling death capsule, still estimated to be travelling at between 100 and 110 kilometers per hour-over 60 miles per hour†(p. 97,98). At this moment Henri Paul had no way of controlling the vehicle and crashed into the thirteenth pillar. After this the photographers made an attempt to call emergency vehicles. Police chief, Metropolitan Police, John Stevens (1997) noted in his report that â€Å"one of the French mobile telephone companies...claimed to have no data forShow MoreRelatedTaking a Look at Conspiracy Theories1319 Words   |  5 Pagesto as conspiracy theorists. The issue that arises with these conspiracy theories is that while some sound over the top ridiculous, some have turned out to be all but true. For this reason, conspiracies are often controversial, they make serious issues into a fairytale, or a simple non-serious event into a serious concerns. These theories are the result of paranoia regardless of their truth, they are often formed on assumptions, absence of information, and fear. For these reasons a conspiracy can beRead MoreEssay on illuminati outline775 Words   |  4 Pagesall over the entertainment news. D. Thesis: Hopefully by the end of my speech yall can understand it more. E. Preview Statements: the Illuminati is a very complex topic but Im just going to try and have the basics of how it began, the purpose, conspiracy, and finally how the illuminati is in our music industries. (Transition into body of speech) LETS START AT THE BEGINNING II. Body A. Main Point #1 (The beginning ): i. (Adam Weishaupt): was born on 6 February 1748 in Germany. He was a philosopherRead MoreCompare the Two Articles on Henri Paul1387 Words   |  6 PagesCompare the articles on Henri Paul: Which one do you think is most persuasive? Diana, princess of Wales died on 30th August 1997. She died in a car crash In a Paris tunnel. At the time she had divorced Prince Charles who was the father or her two children, (Prince William and Harry), and was in a relationship with Dodi Alfayed. This story was reported worldwide. In the article from the Mirror, they give a biased picture of what Henri Paul Is like. They say he Is a â€Å"speed freak† and â€Å"bike nut, couldRead MoreExploring The Illuminati 2566 Words   |  11 Pages The Illuminati is not a conspiracy theory; it is a real thing that is happening today. With all the facts and information about the illuminati, it cannot still be considered a conspiracy theory. The illuminati symbol can be seen all over the place in all parts of the world, including famous entertainers that have Illuminati symbols tattooed on their bodies. With all the turmoil on this planet, it will soon collapse. When it does, who is going to take over? The illuminati will takeRead MoreLiterature Review6685 Words   |  27 Pageslimited research in place, to depict the underlying factor beneath these forms of psychosocial behaviors against vaccines. The notion of worldview approach to anti-vaccine over vaccines is a current one and stems from paranormal, spiritual, and conspiracy beliefs over the vaccines. These non-evidence ways of life seem to reach out to the attitudes parents depict over vaccines for such a long time.[Jolley and Douglas, 2014; Goertzel, 1994] There those, who see that vaccines are unsafe, impure according

Music Sampling free essay sample

The language in our popular music has the ability to shape ones reality. For instance rap artists in their first couple albums that are released their lyrics tell the story of their lives and how hard it was for them before the fame and glory they live today. I think some people can thrive on that and in turn will motivate them to do something for the greater good because they can relate to the experiences and the hard times rap artists have gone through. A good example of this is Tuba Shaker In his song titled Changes. He uses the same beat of the original song written by Phil Collins in 1989, Thats Just the way It Is. I Like Tubas remix better because It Is more up beat and relates to my generation. I believe that Tuba set a new standard for modern day rap artists. Mine Is very aware of Tubas Impact and also uses older beats from older pop artists In his works. Sampling could be taking some of another artist sound recording or lyrics. In todays society majority of the music being played is sampled music from previous generations. Usually when a new artist samples old music It regenerates the song that they took the sample from. Sampling can also Involve creative manipulations, such as changing the speed or pitch of the original sample. The genre Hip-Hop is one of todays popular genres which is made from sampling music. Music sampling began in the sasss and has been used till this day. The introduction of music sampling and hip-hop was a turning point in history leading into a powerful cultural and musical movement. Most of the music that is used for sampling came from Jazz music..It wasnt until the 1 sass and early ass that music sampling really blow up with hip-hop. Vinyl records and tape loops were used to ample music The sampling was done by Ids who had turntables. For more than fifty years music sampling has evolved, beginning with classical composers and is now moving through the hip-hop industry. Hip hop and rap has relied on the practice of sampling ever since, but youll find examples of sampling in other genres occasionally. But legal Issues have largely stifled Its widespread use.In todays society technology has extremely enhanced, although sampling Is common It Is connected to many legal Issues, laws, and restrictions. Many may assume or say that music sampling is stealing because its not original and the artist sees someone elses piece without the consent of the original artist. People also disagree with music sampling because most artist does not give the proper recognition to the original artists. According to lawyer Michelle AIBO, even the smallest shred of anothers work can be Infringement. This means that no matter how much of the piece you took a sample of If you did not get permission from the original artist or composer you are in violation of the law or right. A lot of people believe that music is suppose to be original and made your own. An artists music suppose to illustrate originality and creativity. They also believe that music sampling is the easy way out instead of taking the time to actually sit and develop a relatively creative piece without the use of someone elses work or ideas.Money also plays a artists to be unique and use the samples they would like to. How to make money off of every single sample should not be the focus but more on how to create guidelines for sampling. Furthermore, help staying connected to the music and artist in the past. I dont see anything wrong with sampling music. I believe music sampling is unique and cool. The fact that an artist can take a piece of music from somewhere else and combine it with their own to make a hot record is simply amazing. Music sampling adds a lot of value to songs. Sampling resurrects older artists careers.As Noah Coachman argues, all kinds of artists have always borrowed and built on each others work, these corporations have outlawed an art form. Music sampling depicts a combination of new and old while staying authentic and artistic. It also reconnects a lot of listeners to events in the past, it may also bring back special memories, which is highly important when trying to bring in a wide variety of listeners and customers. Sampling adds a new dimension to the cloudy issue of borrowing within pop music, since the actual recordings of other artists can be used. Young adults like myself like to hear the popular music of today and sometimes even old school music, sampling is the perfect way to combine the two! Its a new vibe with an old school feel to it. Personally I enjoy listening to old school records from the late ass early ass , they tell good stories. Most hip-hop artist are telling a story in their music. I believe artist uses pieces from the past to get older listeners to understand he story that is being told in the song. Of course the younger generation would understand but would the older generation get a sense of understanding if the artist did not use pieces from the past?Not at all, in todays society most older adults believe all artist talk about nowadays is sex, money, and drugs especially if the record sounds unfamiliar to them. For example, when Kindlier Lamar came out with the song Swi mming Pools my mother heard the chorus and automatically did not like the song because she couldnt relate, but once Kindlier Lamar came out with the Eng Poetic Justice she actually took the time out to listen to it because he used a sample from Janet Jackson song Anytime, Any place which is a song she listened to in her younger days. My mom actually listened to the lyrics and began to like the song. Sometimes it takes Just a little piece from the past for people to engage in the music of today. Music sampling would be a lot less controversial if it was regulated. It can be regulated by developing a legalized contract and discussing copyright permission from the owners, etc. Although artist dont intentionally mean to use samples and try o pass them off as their own, copyright owners still saw it as a problem and sued whomever it was that sampled the music.If music sampling was regulated properly there would be less commotion in the music industry. Regulating music sampling would be a big help because it would be fixed to where both the artists (the original artist the sampled artist) would get paid for the piece of music that sells in stores. Therefore both artist would get paid an equal amount of money and the original artist would receive proper recognition and compensation for the original piece. In conclusion music sampling still remains a controversial issue.

Marbury V. Madison Essays - 6th United States Congress,

Marbury v. Madison Constitutional Law Marbury v. Madison Marbury v. Madison, one of the first Supreme Court cases asserting the power of judicial review, is an effective argument for this power; however, it lacks direct textual basis for the decision. Marshall managed to get away with this deficiency because of the silence on many issues and the vague wording of the Constitution. During the early testing period when few precedents existed, there was much debate about fundamental issues concerning what was intended by the words of the Constitution and which part of government should have the final word in defining the meaning of these words. Marshall used the Marbury case to establish the Supreme Court's place as the final judge. Marshall identified three major questions that needed to be answered before the Court could rule on the Marbury v. Madison case. The first of these was, "Has the applicant a right to the commission he demands?" The Constitution allows that "the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, . . . " (Art. II, ? 2). The Judiciary Act of 1793 had given the President the right to appoint federal judges and justices of the peace; there is no dispute that such an appointment was within the scope of the president's powers. Debate arises because the Constitution is silent on the exact time at which the appointment is considered complete. The Supreme Court ruled that "when a commission has been signed by the president, the appointment is made; and that the commission is complete, when the seal of the United States has been affixed to it by the [secretary of state]." This ruling does not have direct constitutional support, but it is not an unreasonable decision. The second question which Marshall addressed was, "If [Marbury] has a right, and that right has been violated, do the laws of this country afford him a remedy?" The answer is logically yes although there are no specific words in the Constitution to support such an answer. Based on the type of government intended by the Constitution, the government is expected to protect individual liberty. As Marshall says, "[The government] will certainly cease to deserve [to be termed a government of laws, and not of men] if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested right." However, with this assertion Marshall established the power of the Supreme Court to review actions of the executive branch - a power that does not stem directly from the Constitution. The third and final question which Marshall addressed was whether Marbury "is entitled to the remedy for which he applies." Marshall further divides this question into two parts: the nature of the writ and the power of the Supreme Court. In examining the nature of the writ, Marshall solidifies further the Supreme Court authority over members of the executive branch. Marshall admits that "the officer to whom [the writ] is to be directed, must be one to whom, on legal principles, such writ may be directed . . . " and that the Supreme Court cannot "enquire how the executive, or executive officers, perform duties in which they have discretion." Yet Marshall insists that the Supreme Court can issue a mandamus "[where the head of a department] is directed by law to do a certain act affecting the absolute rights of individuals." This assertion does not have Constitutional basis. The Constitution does not expressly grant the Supreme Court power over either of the other branches of government. Finally Marshall gets to the question based on which he decides the case - the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over this case. For the first time in this case, Marshall uses direct constitutional basis to make his ruling. He argues that, "If it had been intended to leave it in the discretion of the legislature to apportion the judicial power between the supreme and inferior courts according to the will of that body, it would certainly have been useless to have proceeded further than to have defined the judicial power . . . The plain import of the words seems to be, that in one class of cases its jurisdiction is original and not appellate; in the other it is appellate, and not original." He bases this ruling on Art. III ? 2, which enumerates the cases in which the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. Marshall further maintains that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. In this contention as well Marshall has constitutional basis in Art. VI, which states, "This